is this just an alias?
is this just an alias?
an alias is a topic that starts with the alias markup: alias:xxx
all properties contained in this spec, in various forms
pre processed form - parsed and graphed.
pre processed form - parsed and graphed. No context is used when parsing - only when folding this AST, so you can reuse the AST
attributes are props perhaps overriden in content
set during parsing and folding - false if page has any user-specific elements any scripts or such will make this false this is very pessimistic right now for safety issues: even a whiff of non-static content will turn this off
set during parsing and folding - false if page has any user-specific elements any scripts or such will make this false this is very pessimistic right now for safety issues: even a whiff of non-static content will turn this off
i should be conservative and default to rk.
i should be conservative and default to rk. Note this doesn't check Config.urlcanon
category - you can categorize the specs
other parsing artifacts to be used by knowledgeable modules.
original text content, not pre-processed - this is generally useless
the content, pre-processed, with includes and macros expanded etc.
tags collected during parsing of the content, with some static tags like url,label etc
backup old version and update entry, update index
field definitions as parsed fields are rendered in WForm
either from me, parent or reactor
find template with predicate
find a template for that name (e-a) or implementing that URL
all the links from this page to others, based on parsed content
todo should use this version instead of content - this resolves includes
AST folded with a context
we support draft specs vs non=draft (published)
the actual content, preprocessed
is this just a redirect?
scripts are just a special section
find a section
these are normal - all sections after include
these are when used as a template - template sections do not resolve include
backup old version and update entry, update index
visibility of this spec - see razie.tconf.Visibility
a simple wiki-style entry: language (markdown, mediawiki wikidot etc) and the actual source
There is an "owner" property - owner is supposed to have special privileges