A process where a researcher or organization plans and then executes a series of steps intended to increase the field of healthcare-related knowledge. This includes studies of safety, efficacy, comparative effectiveness and other information about medications, devices, therapies and other interventional and investigative techniques. A ResearchStudy involves the gathering of information about human or animal subjects.
Subclass of hl7.model.DomainResource (A resource that includes narrative, extensions, and contained resources.)
- Value parameters:
- arm
- Describes an expected sequence of events for one of the participants of a study. E.g. Exposure to drug A, wash-out, exposure to drug B, wash-out, follow-up.
- category
- Codes categorizing the type of study such as investigational vs. observational, type of blinding, type of randomization, safety vs. efficacy, etc.
- condition
- The condition that is the focus of the study. For example, In a study to examine risk factors for Lupus, might have as an inclusion criterion "healthy volunteer", but the target condition code would be a Lupus SNOMED code.
- contact
- Contact details to assist a user in learning more about or engaging with the study.
- contained
- These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.
- description
- A full description of how the study is being conducted.
- enrollment
- Reference to a Group that defines the criteria for and quantity of subjects participating in the study. E.g. " 200 female Europeans between the ages of 20 and 45 with early onset diabetes".
- extension
- May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.
- focus
- The medication(s), food(s), therapy(ies), device(s) or other concerns or interventions that the study is seeking to gain more information about.
- id
- The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.
- identifier
- Identifiers assigned to this research study by the sponsor or other systems.
- implicitRules
- A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.
- keyword
- Key terms to aid in searching for or filtering the study.
- language
- The base language in which the resource is written.
- location
- Indicates a country, state or other region where the study is taking place.
- meta
- The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.
- modifierExtension
- May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions. Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).
- note
- Comments made about the study by the performer, subject or other participants.
- objective
- A goal that the study is aiming to achieve in terms of a scientific question to be answered by the analysis of data collected during the study.
- partOf
- A larger research study of which this particular study is a component or step.
- period
- Identifies the start date and the expected (or actual, depending on status) end date for the study.
- phase
- The stage in the progression of a therapy from initial experimental use in humans in clinical trials to post-market evaluation.
- primaryPurposeType
- The type of study based upon the intent of the study's activities. A classification of the intent of the study.
- principalInvestigator
- A researcher in a study who oversees multiple aspects of the study, such as concept development, protocol writing, protocol submission for IRB approval, participant recruitment, informed consent, data collection, analysis, interpretation and presentation.
- protocol
- The set of steps expected to be performed as part of the execution of the study.
- reasonStopped
- A description and/or code explaining the premature termination of the study.
- relatedArtifact
- Citations, references and other related documents.
- site
- A facility in which study activities are conducted.
- sponsor
- An organization that initiates the investigation and is legally responsible for the study.
- status
- The current state of the study.
- text
- A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.
- title
- A short, descriptive user-friendly label for the study.
- Constructor:
Introduces the fields site, note, title, phase, focus, partOf, status, period, contact, keyword, sponsor, protocol, category, location, condition, identifier, enrollment, description, reasonStopped, relatedArtifact, primaryPurposeType, principalInvestigator, arm, objective.
- Companion:
- object
Value members
Inherited methods
Slower than nodalMap, but should work with subtypes (e.g. PositiveInt). If you must use it, then:
Slower than nodalMap, but should work with subtypes (e.g. PositiveInt). If you must use it, then:
T
should not be a Choice[_], a LitSeq[_] or an Option[_]- It may require a type parameter sometimes (e.g.
sampleResource >>[BUNDLE_TYPE] { (_: BUNDLE_TYPE) => BUNDLE_TYPE.SEARCHSET }
)
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
Extract values of type From, and map to LitSeq[To] using fn: From => To. Unlike >>, this is safe even if From is a Choice[], a LitSeq[] or an Option[_] Quite slow, slower than nodalExtract
Extract values of type From, and map to LitSeq[To] using fn: From => To. Unlike >>, this is safe even if From is a Choice[], a LitSeq[] or an Option[_] Quite slow, slower than nodalExtract
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
- Inherited from:
- Utils
- Inherited from:
- Utils
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
Convenience alias for nodalGetByClass andThen map to LitSeq[To] using fn: From => To.
Convenience alias for nodalGetByClass andThen map to LitSeq[To] using fn: From => To.
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
Extract values of type From Unlike nodalMap, this is safe even if From is a Choice[_], a LitSeq[_] or an Option[_], however there remains a caveat with 'subtyped' types (eg PositiveInt), in that we can't differentiate them from the parent class Quite slow but faster than ^^
Extract values of type From Unlike nodalMap, this is safe even if From is a Choice[_], a LitSeq[_] or an Option[_], however there remains a caveat with 'subtyped' types (eg PositiveInt), in that we can't differentiate them from the parent class Quite slow but faster than ^^
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
Bit faster than >>
, but still much slower than using update$foo
when possible. If you must use it, then:
Bit faster than >>
, but still much slower than using update$foo
when possible. If you must use it, then:
T
should not be a Choice[_], a LitSeq[_], an Option[_], or any 'subtyped' type (eg PositiveInt). You should ensure, if T is a supertype of multiple valid choice values (e.g. T =:= Object), that the return value of fn retains the same type as the input value.
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject
- Inherited from:
- FHIRObject